(military-directory) (let chari directory) (trump-directory) (ted voter-directory) 
Without question We the People are in the most dangerous, internal, domestic, and national security threat time in our imperfect, Union Republics, 247 years of history.
Therefore, this unprecedented era deserves such applications to Save the Union and Keep our Republic.
Below is a demonstration of my assertion of the military duty to reject any command that harms federal black citizens, and even arrest any POTUS who resists or impedes “any of them, in any efforts they may make for their actual freedom.” (Emancipation Proclamation)
According To ChatGPT OpenAL
GOD Forbid, albeit…
In the event of a rogue US President or a US President goes role, what is the responsibility of the Chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff?
Having “The Gun” of enforcement, the Chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff is the highest-ranking and ultimate military officer of the United States Armed Forces, and serves as the principal military advisor (“It is or is not in your, nor the Union Republics’ interest”) to the President, the Secretary of Defense, and the National Security Council.
In the event of a rogue US President or a situation where a President goes rogue, the responsibilities of the Chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff could be complex and are guided by the principles of civilian control of the military and adherence to the Constitution.
Here’s how the situation might unfold:
- Civilian Control of the Military: One of the foundational principles of the United States is civilian control of the military. This means that the President, as the Commander-in-Chief, holds ultimate authority over the military forces.The Chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and other military leaders are subordinate to civilian leadership.
- Advisory Role: The Chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff would likely engage in private discussions with other military leaders, legal advisors, and possibly other members of the National Security Council to assess the situation and determine the appropriate course of action. This would include considering the legality of the President’s orders and the potential risks to national security.
- Legal and Constitutional Analysis: If the President’s actions are deemed illegal or unconstitutional, the Chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff might seek legal advice from military lawyers (Judge Advocates General) and possibly consult with civilian legal experts.
The military must uphold the Constitution, and actions that go against it might warrant a response.
- Chain of Command: The Chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, along with other senior military leaders, is part of the chain of command. If there are concerns about the legality or consequences of the President’s orders, the military leaders might provide recommendations to the President or seek clarification. It’s important to note that refusing a direct and lawful order from the President could be seen as insubordination, which carries its own legal and military consequences.
- Constitutional Crisis: If the situation escalates to a point where there is a genuine belief that the President’s actions pose an imminent threat to national security or the stability of the government, military leaders might have to consider their duty to the Constitution and the country as a whole.
This is an extremely complex and sensitive situation, as military intervention in domestic politics goes against the principles of democracy and civilian control.
It’s worth emphasizing that such a scenario is unprecedented in the modern history of the United States.
The country’s democratic institutions, checks and balances, and respect for the rule of law are designed to prevent such situations from occurring.
The military is an institution that operates within the framework of civilian leadership, and any deviation from this norm would have far-reaching and unpredictable consequences.