“The entire race designated as blacks.”Johnson placed the entire Black population within the classes covered by “all persons born in the United States.” “People of color.”He expressly used this additional identification immediately after referring to the Black race. “Negroes.”Johnson specifically named Negroes as persons whom the bill would make federal citizens. “Mulattoes.”He separately identified persons …
“The entire race designated as blacks.”Johnson placed the entire Black population within the classes covered by “all persons born in the United States.” “People of color.”He expressly used this additional identification immediately after referring to the Black race. “Negroes.”Johnson specifically named Negroes as persons whom the bill would make federal citizens. “Mulattoes.”He separately identified persons …
The Seventeen Johnson Veto Identification of “All persons born…” Read More »
Read and Study “The Primary Beneficiaries Doctrine, Smoking Gun Evidence @ https://tedhayes.us/primdoct-sgun/ The Directory of Letters To Federal Government @ https://tedhayes.us/letter-directory/ Presidential Moratorium @ https://tedhayes.us/the14thmorpapers/ Manchild in the Promised Land That Was Not Born” @ https://tedhayes.us/neverbornchild/ The Letter To We the People @ https://tedhayes.us/lettertowepeeps/
REHEAR AND ENFORCE Working Draft Constitutional Memorandum Why This Proposal Deserves Immediate Legal Attention: An Accompanying Narrative for Constitutional Counsel BEFORE “SUBJECT O THE JURISDICTION THEREOF”
A Preliminary Memorandum for Counsel Concerning the Proper Sequence of Constitutional Analysis in Case No. 25-365 “Every sound legal analysis begins by identifying the proper question before attempting to answer it.” Counsel, Because the period for seeking further review under Rule 44 is rapidly approaching, I respectfully submit this brief preliminary memorandum before forwarding …
REHEAR AND ENFORCE Working Draft Constitutional Memorandum FOR IMMEDIATE PROFESSIONAL REVIEW Counsel, Because the period for seeking further review under Supreme Court Rule 44 is rapidly expiring, I am forwarding the accompanying working draft of my constitutional memorandum in its present form rather than waiting for editorial perfection. The manuscript remains under final revision. Footnotes, …
REHEAR AND ENFORCE Working Draft Constitutional Memorandum Read More »
Thank you for agreeing to review this proposal. I recognize that constitutional attorneys are approached regularly with theories claiming to have discovered overlooked historical evidence or new constitutional interpretations. Most do not withstand careful legal scrutiny. Accordingly, I do not ask that you accept the conclusions presented here simply because I have reached them. I …
The author is not an attorney and does not present this memorandum as legal advice or as a substitute for representation by qualified counsel. The historical theories, constitutional questions, interpretive framework, and principal arguments presented here arose from the author’s decades of independent grassroots research, lived experience, civic advocacy, and study of Reconstruction-era legislation and …
AUTHOR’S STATEMENT REGARDING METHOD AND ASSISTANCE Read More »
Counsel, Because the period for seeking further review under Supreme Court Rule 44 is rapidly expiring, I am forwarding the accompanying working draft of my constitutional memorandum in its present form rather than waiting for editorial perfection. The manuscript remains under final revision. Footnotes, appendices, formatting, source verification, and several editorial refinements are still being …
This memorandum began with a question. It did not begin with an accusation. Nor did it begin with a predetermined conclusion. It began by asking whether the Civil Rights Act of 1866, President Andrew Johnson’s contemporaneous veto messages, the debates of the Thirty-Ninth Congress, the Reconstruction Amendments, and the subsequent development of constitutional jurisprudence should …