President Trump, Complete Lincoln’s Covenant of Actual Freedom A Respectful Appeal to Pause, Withdraw, or Reframe Trump v. Barbara Until the Chattel Children Are Heard The Honorable Donald J. Trump President of the United StatesThe White House1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NWWashington, DC 20500 Re: Trump v. Barbara — A Lincoln-Level Opportunity to Complete the Work of …
The matter of Trump v. Barbara, according to our view, is far bigger than politics, immigration, or party affiliation. This is not merely Democrats versus Republicans, nor simply conservatives versus liberals. This is a historic constitutional crossroads concerning the original purpose, identity, and remedial spirit behind America’s Reconstruction-era federal laws — particularly the Civil Rights …
THE MATTER OF TRUMP v. BARBARA More Than a Court Case Read More »
While Trump v. Barbara may signal potential constitutional danger for Black Federal Citizens — raising fears of further dilution, confusion, or loss surrounding the original remedial purpose of Reconstruction-era citizenship — it may also contain an unprecedented opportunity. For the first time in generations, millions may finally awaken to that exceptional, experiential super-citizenship status …
Trump Sounded The Sacred “Trumpet” of The 14th Amendment and WOKE US UP Read More »
[Pending Supreme Court Decision] The US Supreme Court Is Deliberating the citizenship fate of American Black Federal Citizenship Status To Be Decided This Late June. Trump v. Barbara Case # (No. 25-365) President Donald J. Trump Represented by the DOJ (Department of Justice) Barabara Represented by ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union) NAACP Amicua Curai Brief …
ATTENTION ALERT EMERGENCY: 14TH AMEND. “BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP” CRISIS Read More »
The Cue Card For Calling Others This information will assist in sharing with others, being able to effectively answer questions, even those they have not even thought of. THE GREAT DELIBERATION Trump v. Barbara (No. 25-365), the 14th Amendment, and the Question of Federal Citizenship Amicus Cariae of Both Sides: Trump v. Barbara – …
(alert directory) This Supreme Court matter of our US federalized citizenship is the most important matter of Black Lives, for whom the world shouts, “Black Lives Matter.” Being now “WOKE ” – AWAKENED, according to the authorities of the 1863 Emancipation Proclamation, the 1866 Civil Rights Act (The Act) of Our Exclusive Citizenship, and other …
(alert directory) These briefs generally argued: The Citizenship Clause plainly protects birthright citizenship, United States v. Wong Kim Ark controls the issue. and the executive branch cannot unilaterally narrow constitutional protections of citizenship. Trump Represented by: The Department of Justice (DOJ) Barbara Represented by: The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) Amicus Briefs Supporting Trump / …
(alert directory) Reconstruction Began as Emergency Constitutional Care The national debate surrounding birthright citizenship has largely ignored the original constitutional purpose for which the Reconstruction Amendments and the Civil Rights Act of 1866 were enacted. In the aftermath of chattel slavery, Congress did not operate in abstraction, theory, or philosophical speculation. It confronted a living …
The Constitutional Medicine Was Prescribed for a Specific Patient Read More »
(alert directory) Reconstruction Was Tailored for a Specific Constitutional Injury The Reconstruction Amendments were not stitched together as abstract garments for an undefined future world. They were carefully tailored in the aftermath of slavery to fit a specific constitutional injury and a specific constitutional people. The Civil Rights Act of 1866 and the 14th Amendment …