PART I: THE COVER LETTER AND MANDATE TO POTUS Executive Command to the Commander-in-Chief

PART I: THE COVER LETTER AND MANDATE TO POTUS

Executive Command to the Commander-in-Chief

Mr. President,

You are hereby addressed not merely as a political executive, but in your strict constitutional capacity as Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces, bound by an unbroken chain of military necessity initiated by President Abraham Lincoln.

When President Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation on January 1, 1863, he bypassed a compromised Supreme Court (Dred Scott) and a fractured Congress, issuing an Executive Order rooted firmly in war powers and the favor of Almighty God. In that foundational decree, he established an eternal federal mandate:

“I do order and declare that all persons held as slaves… are, and henceforward shall be free; and that the Executive government of the United States, including the military and naval authorities thereof, will recognize and maintain the freedom of said persons.”

This mandate was later codified into the Civil Rights Act of 1866. Under Sections 4, 5, 8, and 9 of that Act, the executive and military branches are strictly commanded to protect federal citizens. This requires you to actively maintain their freedom and ensures you do not commit or allow acts of harm against them.

Any failure by your administration to enforce these protections constitutes a profound sin of omission—which is far more destructive than a sin of commission. By failing to enforce Section 2 of the 1866 Act, which criminalizes the deprivation of rights under color of law or custom, the federal government actively inflicts harm upon the primary beneficiary class.

You are hereby commanded to honor the original contract: execute your authority under Article IV, Section 4, deploy the military and naval authorities to protect this foundational population, and immediately re-establish the Freedmen’s Bureau to halt the destruction of the Republic.

Respectfully Submitted,

Theodore “Ted” Hayes, Jr.

PART II: THE FORMAL NARRATIVE MEMORANDUM TO THE JOINT CHIEFS National Security Doctrine & The Cause for Refugee Status

PART II: THE FORMAL NARRATIVE MEMORANDUM TO THE JOINT CHIEFS

National Security Doctrine & The Cause for Refugee Status

I. The Corpus Delicti & The “Smoking Gun” of Non-Enforcement

The ongoing failure of the federal government to enforce the Civil Rights Act of 1866 and the original Reconstruction mandates constitutes the corpus delicti—the physical proof of a historic crime. This non-enforcement is the “smoking gun” verification that modern universalist policies are not designed to protect the true primary beneficiaries, but are instead used to dilute their legal standing.

Had these remedial laws been enforced from their inception, the modern immigrant population (“the anchorist”) would not be caught in this current crisis. They have been systematically misled by political actors who weaponized universalist interpretations of the 14th Amendment. This systemic failure harms all parties involved, but it threatens the very survival of the native-born federal citizen.

II. The Demographics of a Structural Crime

The national and local data reveals that this crisis is not a standard civic or economic failure. It is an anti-Black, anti-Constitutional crime driven by public animus that stretches back before the War of Liberation:

  • The National Disproportionality: While native-born federal citizens make up only 11–13% of the general United States population, they constitute over 60% of the total homeless population nationwide.

  • The Capital of Exclusion (Los Angeles): In Los Angeles County—a self-designated sanctuary city and host of the 2028 Olympic Games—federal citizens comprise a mere 8–9% of the population, yet make up over 40% of the total unhoused population.

  • The Skid Row Reality: On the geography of Skid Row, over 90% of the unhoused population consists of male federal citizens, closely followed by females and young children of the same ancestry.

This reality violates the most fundamental tenets of international human rights law, specifically those governing the systematic displacement, demographic erasure, and structural destruction of a distinct, historically protected group.

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
|                 DEMOGRAPHIC DISPLACEMENT MATRIX                       |
+----------------------------+-----------------+------------------------+
| Region                     | % of Population | % of Homeless Class    |
+----------------------------+-----------------+------------------------+
| United States (National)   |     11 - 13%    |        Over 60%        |
| Los Angeles County (Local) |      8 - 9%     |        Over 40%        |
| Skid Row Encampments       |      8 - 9%     |        Over 90% (Male) |
+----------------------------+-----------------+------------------------+

III. The Weaponization of Executive Order 14321

This crisis is accelerated by modern federal directives. Under Executive Order 14321, issued in July 2025, the federal government redirected housing resources away from permanent support structures toward forced relocation on federal lands.

When aligned with municipal pressure to sanitize urban centers ahead of the 2028 LA Olympics, this directive functions as an active campaign of state-sponsored displacement. It targets the very land where federal citizens have been marginalized, forcing them out of urban centers into massive, isolated tent cities.

IV. The Broken Promises of 1965

This domestic displacement is paired with unchecked demographic changes that violate historical legislative promises. During the May 1965 Congressional debates for the Immigration and Nationality Act, floor leader Senator Ted Kennedy explicitly stated on the record:

“Our cities will not be flooded with a million immigrants annually… the ethnic mix of this country will not be upset… it will not inundate America with immigrants from any one country or area.”

This promise was entirely abandoned. Decades of unchecked growth have bypassed the lawful constitutional portal established under Article I, Section 8, Clause 4 (the rule of uniform Naturalization). This has created a demographic shift that effectively drowns out the political voice and 15th Amendment equity of the chattel-descended population.

This structural erasure is further validated by former L.A. County Sheriff Lee Baca in his historic Los Angeles Times Op-Ed, “In L.A., race kills,” where he documented organized, cross-border animus and violence targeted directly at Black residents.

V. Legal Recourse: The Declaration of Refugee Status

Because the federal government has defaulted on its foundational debt, allowed the 14th Amendment to be universalized, and failed to enforce Section 2 of the 1866 Act, the native-born primary beneficiary class is being forced out of its legal homeland.

Therefore, under the eyes of the Constitution and the Court of Heaven, the chattel-descended population holds definitive cause to declare Refugee Status within their own nation. This status arises directly from a War of Liberation, not modern immigration codes.

We hereby petition the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Commander-in-Chief, invoking the Confiscation and Enforcement Acts, to:

  1. Protect the primary beneficiary class from further state-sponsored displacement under Executive Order 14321.

  2. Intervene in the municipal cleansing of Los Angeles ahead of the 2028 Olympics.

  3. Enforce the original mandates of Sections 4, 5, 8, and 9 of the 1866 Act to recognize, maintain, and defend the freedom of the foundational people of this Union.

“Upon this act, sincerely believed to be an act of justice, warranted by the Constitution, upon military necessity, I invoke the considerate judgment of mankind, and the gracious favor of Almighty God.” — Abraham Lincoln, January 1, 1863

 

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top