Hey Prof. Eastan, Shalom! We now have seven days before SCOTUS delivers its verdict on 25-365. From I can sense, its appears that President Trump is going to be denied and my federal citizenship is going be granted, by Bench legislation to the anchorist, therey, replacying the real Subject Beneficiaries with a foriegn population, transfromed …
Letter II: Professor Eastman – Last Effort Chance Read More »
Before the 250-year-old, latent, but now Preambled We the People and The Supreme Judge of All the World, Which Is Celebrating With 1776 USA Birth In and by Precious Blood of primarily young white boys and men, Trump’s Birthday Grandist Gift of All To America for its 1776. Phase I: MORATORIUM- Withdraw SCOTUS case …
Here is how those two specific analogies came together in your writing: 1. The Tailor / Suit Analogy (“IF THE SUIT DOESN’T FIT… Claimant Must Quit”) In this piece (and your corresponding letter to the Supreme Court, The Suit Does Not Fit), you compared constitutional law to a master tailor creating a bespoke garment. The …
TO: President Donald J. Trump FROM: Ted Hayes, aka “Mr. Patriot” (Founder, Justiceville) DATE: June 23, 2026 SUBJECT: Direct Request for the Withdrawal of Your Trump v. Barbara (Docket No. 25-365) Supreme Court Case I. The Strategic Directive: Immediate Withdrawal of Docket No. 25-365 Mr. President, I am writing to you directly to present …
MEMORANDUM FOR THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES Read More »
(The Dossier) Date: June 21, 2026 Professor John Eastman The Claremont Institute 1317 W. Foothill Blvd. Upland, CA 91786 RE: The Semi-quincentennial Realignment: Why POTUS Must Unilaterally Withdraw Trump v. Barbara, No. 25-365 Hey Professor Eastman, Shalom! I am writing to you with the highest sense of historic, strategic, and prophetic urgency following the April …
(Prof. letter) The Master Thesis: The Primary Beneficiary Doctrine and the False Premise of Case No. 25-365 Volume I: The Primary Beneficiary Doctrine Subtitle: Restitution of Omission and the Smoking Gun of the 1866 Veto The Methodology of Historic Forensics In the adjudication of constitutional jurisprudence, time tends to introduce a dangerous legal drift. Over …
1. The Tailor / Suit Analogy (“IF THE SUIT DOESN’T FIT… Claimant Must Quit”) In this piece (and your corresponding letter to the Supreme Court, The Suit Does Not Fit), you compared constitutional law to a master tailor creating a bespoke garment. The Custom Fit: The Civil Rights Act of 1866 and the 14th Amendment …
The Two Analogies of The Drift From The 1866 Federal Citizenship of Chattel Americans Read More »
To the Honorable Chief Justice and Associate Justices Supreme Court of the United States Washington, D.C. 20543 Re: The Suit Does Not Fit: Four Grounds for Dismissal, Suspension, or Rehearing in Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al. v. Barbara, et al., No. 25-365 Honorable Justices: Introduction: The Case Rests on a …
To the Honorable Chief Justice and Associate Justices Read More »
Subject: Request for Constitutional Review Concerning the Unfinished Work of Reconstruction, Federal Citizenship, and National Stability General Caine, I respectfully submit this communication not only on my own behalf, but on behalf of many descendants of those for whom the Emancipation Proclamation, the Confiscation Acts, the Civil Rights Act of 1866, and the Reconstruction Amendments …
LETTER TO THE CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF Read More »
Greetings, fellow US Federalized and State Citizens, Shalom! Listed in this directory are the Brief itself, various documents, and sent letters. Granted, this is a lot of information, but please read and study as though your USA citizenship and very life of yourself, and family, and the very nation under GOD, built upon the 245 …