1866 Civil Rights Act

REHEAR AND ENFORCE

Constitutional Memorandum to the President of the United States To: The President of the United States Through: Counsel to the President; Attorney General of the United States; Solicitor General of the United States From: Ted Hayes, Mr. Citizen Patriot Subject: Petition for Rehearing in Trump v. Barbara, Enforcement of the Reconstruction Citizenship Settlement, and Protection …

REHEAR AND ENFORCE Read More »

REHEAR AND ENFORCE: Cover Letter to the President of the United States

Request for Immediate Counsel Review and Lawful Presidential Action The President of the United States The White House Washington, D.C. Re: Immediate Review of Trump v. Barbara, Supreme Court Rule 44, and Enforcement of the Reconstruction Citizenship Settlement Dear Mr. President: I respectfully submit the enclosed constitutional memorandum, REHEAR AND ENFORCE, for your immediate review …

REHEAR AND ENFORCE: Cover Letter to the President of the United States Read More »

Why This Proposal Deserves Immediate Legal Attention

An Accompanying Narrative for Constitutional Counsel Thank you for agreeing to review this proposal. I recognize that constitutional attorneys are approached regularly with theories claiming to have discovered overlooked historical evidence or new constitutional interpretations. Most do not withstand careful legal scrutiny. Accordingly, I do not ask that you accept the conclusions presented here simply …

Why This Proposal Deserves Immediate Legal Attention Read More »

Attorney Elevator Speech From Lance To Attorneys

Attorney Elevator Speech Counsel, may I have one minute? Ted Hayes has developed a constitutional proposal arising from Supreme Court Case No. 25-365 entitled REHEAR AND ENFORCE. Its central thesis is that the constitutional analysis may have begun too late in the Reconstruction sequence. The proposal argues that the proper legal foundation begins with the …

Attorney Elevator Speech From Lance To Attorneys Read More »

Request Letter To Profess Eastman Concerning REHEARING of 25-365

Hey Prof. Eastman, greetings and Shalom! Post the tragic SCOTUS 25-365 ruling against my Remedial, 1866, 14th Amendment LOCKED, US federal citizenship, going forward, these are my concerns and requests of you. They Are” While you may still be barred from direct contact with the POTUS, given the gravity of what is being requested of …

Request Letter To Profess Eastman Concerning REHEARING of 25-365 Read More »

URGENT: Trump v. Barbara Rehearing — Return to the Civil Rights Act of 1866 (short version)

URGENT NOTICE REGARDING TRUMP v. BARBARA, No. 25-365  Rehearing Under MORATORIUM — Return to the Civil Rights Act of 1866 See (long version) To: President Donald J. Trump Cc: U.S. Department of Justice; Solicitor General of the United States; Professor John Eastman; Speaker of the House; House Minority Leader; Senate Majority Leader; Senate Minority Leader; …

URGENT: Trump v. Barbara Rehearing — Return to the Civil Rights Act of 1866 (short version) Read More »

THE GREAT 14TH AMENDMENT MORATORIUM PAPERS: The Birthright Citizenship National Security Crisis

Education Before Adjudication” A National Appeal in America’s 250th Year PREAMBLE The Question America Never Finished Asking As America approaches its 250th year, the nation stands before a constitutional question of extraordinary magnitude. Yet there is growing reason to believe that the public, the media, elected officials, and even the courts have never fully examined …

THE GREAT 14TH AMENDMENT MORATORIUM PAPERS: The Birthright Citizenship National Security Crisis Read More »

A RESPECTFUL PETITION FOR A CONSTITUTIONAL MORATORIUM

An Appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States Before Judgment in Trump v. Barbara To the Honorable Chief Justice and Associate Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States: As the Nation approaches the 250th Anniversary of the Declaration of Independence, the United States finds itself once again confronting questions concerning citizenship, …

A RESPECTFUL PETITION FOR A CONSTITUTIONAL MORATORIUM Read More »

THRESHOLD QUESTIONS: Questions the Supreme Court Should Answer Before Judgment

Questions the Supreme Court Should Answer Before Judgment Every constitutional controversy eventually reaches a threshold. A point beyond which the discussion cannot responsibly proceed until certain foundational questions have been answered. The present controversy concerning birthright citizenship appears to have reached such a moment. For generations, Americans have debated the meaning of the Citizenship Clause …

THRESHOLD QUESTIONS: Questions the Supreme Court Should Answer Before Judgment Read More »

THE 1866 ACT of Federalized Citizenship: The Ten Sections America Forgot

The Ten Sections America Forgot When Americans discuss citizenship, civil rights, and the Fourteenth Amendment, they often begin in the middle of the story. They begin with court decisions.  They begin with political debates.  They begin with modern controversies. They begin with the 3 words “All persons born…” Yet history began earlier. Before the Fourteenth …

THE 1866 ACT of Federalized Citizenship: The Ten Sections America Forgot Read More »

Scroll to Top