Tea Party 2011

Occupy 2011

Tea Party 2011

Occupy 2011

Part I 

 It’s About Individual Liberty Personal Money Instead of Moral Rectitude

Obviously, Americans of immigrant heritage have woefully confused the Dream of the American CREED with that of an American GREED by concocting the Declaration of Independence testimony of “life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness (property)” to mean, the individual, "GOD-given" right to satisfy personal lust  for capital material wealth-Money by any selfish means necessary!

To be just, such nation-destroying behavior is not only an American trait, but one that has been the universal possession of the 1% of the population of any given civilization in history over the 99%.

This policy and practive has plagued humanity since its inception by ancient, Hametic, Black ruled Babylon which is the foundation or cradle of all modern civilization.

Concomitantly, the Sons and Daughters, i.e., descendants of the American Chattel Slaves of West & Central African heritage, who were inherited into the jurisdiction of the United States from the British Empire July 4,1776, are disproportionately 60% of the American Homeless populations, while being a mere 11% of the general.

Commonality of Tea Party and "Occupy"

Ironically, instead of moral proclivity, money of a personal, individual, family interest has been and remains the fundamental basis of these two recent upstart, 1776 revolutionary-type of American movements.

While certain of their tactical approaches or styles to correctly complain against corrupt government, and "Wall Street" greed, they both equally ignore the well being of fellows who are far less fortunate than themselves i.e. the Homeless, who in America are disproportinately the Sons and Daughters or Descendants of the Chattel Slaves and Freemen.

Note: Interestingly, the modern day movement which prides itself on orderly conduct in the "redress of grieviences" respect  of laws and frowns upon destruction of private, even corporate ownership of property, it is the "occupy" movement which seems to be more on-line with the "radical" behavior of the original Tea Party founding fathers of 1773.

Out of frustration with the "corrupt" government and the "Wall Street" business corporations of 1773, the original Tea Party, birthed in Boston, the British-American Massachusettes colony, committed three actions that the self anointed inheritors of that legendary legacy, would not consider, whereas, "occupy" does and acts upon it.

The certain, not all, of the 1773 Boston founding fathers lodged their protest by breaking two laws, which were trespassing onto private property of corporate-owned commerical ships, and destruction of Tea cargo.

Also, in an intoxicating, mental state of rabble rousal, similar to some in todays' "occupy", the Boston Tea Partiers had dressed themselves "annynously", even as local Indigenous (Indians) peoples, seeking to cast blame on the innocent.  "Blame the wild, drunken, savage Indian!" sydrome!

Attired in disguieses, theirs was an act of cowardly property terrorism, along the lines of the Ku Klux Klan who under the cover of "annonymous", destroyed the property of former slaves, as well as masked Jihadist.  If the deeds of the original Tea Party were indeed justified, there should not have been any reason for disguises.

Also, it is one thing to be disguised as a "annymous", bombastic character in protest demonstrations as the "occupiers", but a complete other to actually portray it law willful breaking in such a way that cast dangerous blame on the innocent, as did the original Tea Partiers to the local indigenous populace.  Didn't they already have enough troubles without being blamed for anti-capitalist behavior.

But alas, the radical, roudy, disruptive, riotous and even property destructive behavior of the youthful "occupiers", for which they are castigated, ironically, are the very things committed by the original Tea Party that Patriot Americans today are so proud of.  How can this be?

While one is conservative in their values and the other is liberal, which of these twins more emulate the founding fathers of the original Boston Tea Party, the inspirator of todays movement? 

Though demographically different, these two identical anti-Wall Street and anti-Big Government movements are arguing over MONEY.

The universal passion about money is, who controls money, how and when money is spent, and ever scheming on wresting more money from those who have the most money, instead of liberating folks at the botton of societies from the predatory, dehumanizing circumstances that greed or evil love-quest for money which spawns economic, political, sococial, religious power.

These movements are actually paternal, conjoined twins of different sides of the same “coin”, speaking different languages, but saying the same identical thing, which is, “Money, however it can be orchestrated, either by Capital or Socialistic Greed.”

Thanks for your consideration and all the Blessing of GOD and the Laws of Nature to you and yours,

Ted Hayes

America’s Black Sheild

contunue to Part II...> > >

Articles Page