|
|
Equal Justice Under the Law For Whom
STANDING
Part III |
|
|
...continues from Part II
The “Custom” of Anchorism However, according to the Civil Rights of 1866, any and all such measures are un-Constitutional, thereby relegating them only to mere emotional driven “customs”.
“And be it further enacted, That any person who, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, shall subject, or cause to be subjected, any inhabitant of any State or Territory to the deprivation of any right secured or protected by this act, or to different punishment, pains, or penalties on account of such person having at any time been held in a condition of slavery or involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, or by reason of his color or race, than is prescribed for the punishment of white persons, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and, on conviction, shall be punished by fine not exceeding one thousand dollars, or imprisonment not exceeding one year, or both, in the discretion of the court”
STANDING. It is imperative that legislative leaders defending the original intent of the 14th Amendment-Birthrigth Citizenship include certain, American Black US citizens- DOCS to help them to argue the various points as well.
> Annuit Septus - "HE Has Favored Our Undertaking"
Therefore, it is the business of legislators who are defending the National Birth Certificate and Identity Rights of the 14th Amendment-1866 Civil Rights Act, begin to strategize a plan of action that sets legitimate plaintiffs' plight at the core of the fight against the invasion.
read more at Part IV...Tri-Fold Benefits |
||
|
MLK DREAM Act: Front Page |
|
STANDING: Definition |