The 2016 Presidential Election
Referendum On The Founding Father’s
Electoral
Trust In We The People
See Referendum On We the People
or
The Unexpected Vindication of King George III
Were they right or wrong 240
years ago in their bloody argument with Christian, mother country
The Vindication of King George
Will “crazy” ole King George
He argues behalf all monarchs of all time, that the
masses are not capable of self governing and must therefore be governed
by strong monarchial figures with very little input of ideas from them,
as they naturally are not equipped to do so.
Self-Governing: Contrary To Nature
Regardless of how We the People function in our “new”
found governing responsibility, as they didn’t directly create, though a
victorious few warred for this form of US government, the greater
accountability for losing the republic will be post humorously placed
upon the founding fathers for involving their innocent, unsuspecting
posterity in a tenuous position contrary to nature, and even Natures’
GOD.
We the People, Won't Vote
In fact, the vast majority of eligeble American voters, don't not register to vote. Of those who do register, the vast majority of them don't vote, leaving a very tiny portion of the population making the decisions of who and what will govern them all. Such is not the republic of the founding father's dream.
Tomorrow, on November 8th, the final presidential
polling day choice between the Hon. Ms. Hillary R. Clinton and the Hon.
Donald J. Trump, political pundits assert of either side, that this
election is a referendum on one or the other.
The Founding Father's Wisdom At Stake
However, contrary to that sentiment, especially given
the unusual nature of this campaign season, and favorability rating of
each, this 2016, POTUS election is actually a referendum on the founding
father’s wisdom ordering We the People “to more perfect the Union”, etc.
According to the Declaration of Independence,
political, government officials govern by our permission stating,
“That to secure
these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just
powers from the consent of the governed.”
Essentially, the founding fathers authorizes and
demands that We the People strictly supervise the elected and appointed
individuals whom they chose to govern over them.
While both POTUS candidates have issues that causes
them low ratings, as is HIS apparent *policy and practice, it appears
that GOD, the Central Figure of the Declaration of Independence is
presenting We the People a clear opportunity to manifest our ability to
supervise our government.
Note: “I call
heaven and earth to record this day against you,
that I have set
before you life and death, blessing and cursing: therefore choose life,
that both thou and thy seed may live:” Deuteronomy 30:19 and “…choose
you this day whom ye will serve…as for me and my house, we will serve
the LORD” Joshua 24:15
The Choice
This election will clearly
demonstrate as to whether We the People are possessed with good sense
when making a decision about the life or death of the
Regardless of political partisanship, We the People
have the choice of either:
·
One,
an energetic "old" man who is bombastic, sexually-driven, that has
privately spoken crudely about sex with women, as well as having some
questionable business practices, but has not broken any laws;
·
The
other, a tired “old” woman who via her
governmental positions, has violated US security laws, thereby placing
the nation in potential danger to foreign interests, as well as using
public office and family, charitable foundation to vastly increase her
wealth by quid pro quo arrangements with donors, and even hypocritically
receiving large sums of money from governmental regimes that are
violently oppressive to women, children, and other “deplorable and
unredeemable” peoples within them.
The Founding Father's Big Gamble
While the choice is that of We the People, the
culpability of their decision is actually upon the founding fathers whom
choose to gamble against nature, et al, and by entrusting “commoners”,
their posterity, gravely with the fate of the Union republic.
On the surface, perhaps placing such power into the
hands of the natural law-driven human beings whom naturally are
monarchist, that is, need to be told what to do, is as the folly of
giving a loaded gun with a hair trigger to an 8 years here child to play
with.
It appears that the founding fathers gambled with the
fate of their posterity, when they went against their own definition of
governmental control by placing such authority and power in the hands of
nature-driven We the People, as self-governing is not, historically, a
natural occurrence within human behavior.
Nonetheless, the founding
fathers gambled that their willingness to buck nature, and create an
aberrational government and society will saved by supernatural, divine,
providential intervention from the Creator Himself, i.e.
So again, perhaps, Christian
king George